Original Maxims
|
Subordinate
This original maxim is subordinate because without out the first clause of the sentence, there would actually be no sentence. There would just be an dependent clause. |
This maxim here is a compound sentence that is made up of an independent and dependent clause.
|
|
Subordinate
This original maxim is subordinate because this sentence flows together and is trying to get a particular point across. |
This maxim is a simple sentence that would be said in a situation of giving advice to someone.
|
|
Subordinate
This original maxim is subordinate because it can not be separated and stand alone. This sentence is telling you the consequence of not thinking before you act and speak. |
This maxim is a another simple sentence.
|
|
Subordinate
This original maxim is subordinate because it doesn't hold the qualities of an additive sentence, which can stand alone. |
The maxim is a compound sentence.
|
|
Subordinate
This statement is also a subordinate sentence because it needs the prefix and the suffix of the sentence to be complete. |
This maxim is a simple sentence.
|
|
Additive
This original maxim is an additive statement because it can stand on its on. |
This maxim is a compound sentence.
|
|
Additive/Subordinate
This original maxim contains two sentences and therefore, these are able to both stand on their own. It is also subordinate because the second sentence is based off of the first sentence. |
This maxim is made up of two parts and both are simple sentences.
|
|
Additive
This sentence s simple and to the point, which makes it an additive sentence. |
This maxim is a simple sentence.
|
|
Additive
This is a question that stands on its own and gets the mind working. |
This maxim is a rhetorical question.
|
|
Additive/Subordinate
This last original maxim is both additive and subordinate because it can stand on its own when both clauses are together, but if they are separated they would not make sense. |
This maxim is a simple sentence.
|